72 comments

cube00
I'm not sure people seeing "Made for Apple silicon" will expect an Electron app.
danielbilekq OP
That's fair enough. I'll change that, so it doesn't seem misleading
yboris
I recently migrated a few of my Electron apps to Tauri -- was easy and fast in my case -- went down from 130mb installer to 3mb installer. Worth considering!

https://github.com/whyboris/Simplest-File-Renamer <- 130mb to 3mb from Electron to Tauri

will expect an Electron app.

Whoops! Thanks for the warning. I'm out.

Shame, too. I've been looking for a new text editor. Someone else in this thread recommended SubEtha. I'll take a look there, instead. Happy to keep my Mac Electron-free.

tccole
Out of curiosity; how come?
bityard
A web browser is one of the most complex pieces of software developed by human civilization, there should be no need to ship one with each and every trivial to semi-trivial app.
Some people think it’s bad performance and bloat. They learned it ten years ago and haven’t questioned it
tccole
So what’s the alternative, Tauri?
odo1242
I've made some personal custom apps with it, it works pretty well. With the latest version you can also choose what language to use on the backend side, so you aren't limited to just the original Tauri + Rust framework and can also use Tauri + Node/Typescript (still faster than Electron since you don't need to bundle Chromium + Node) or Tauri + Swift / Kotlin / Go / etc.
Both Tauri and Electron are excellent
Out of curiosity; how come?

Speed. Efficiency. UI consistency. Cross-program features that nearly every "framework" fails at.

On my macOS machines, I make an effort to only use native apps. I can't speak for what Apple ships with the OS, but AFAIK, everything I've added is native.

Perhaps it's just a placebo effect, but everything on my five-year-old personal M1 MacBook Pro feels just as snappy as the mixed bag on my two-year-old work M4 MacBook Pro.

delduca
I can recommend Bear (https://bear.app) been using for ~6 years or more. Truly native and 100% macOS-ish.
One time purchase, then I would have been interested. Yeah, a free version, but subscription…
It's 2026, I always expect an Electron app, unfortunately
drcongo
I've started getting warnings from MacDown about how it'll stop working soon because Rosetta or something. I like the side by side view, but sadly this isn't that.

edit: Oh, electron?!

danielbilekq OP
Yeah, it's an electron app. Is it causing a "not good" feeling on its own, or do you have another suggestion?
That's the app I'm looking for a direct replacement for as well.
michelb
There are a ton, there is Typora (paid) and there is https://github.com/joelbqz/writer-computer (Tauri)

But Macdown is a universal binary? https://github.com/schuyler/macdown3000 So it should just keep working

There's a newer MacDown--MacDown 3000 [1]. It's a universal binary, so it'll keep running once Rosetta goes away.

[1]: https://macdown.app

Honestly the first time I’ve seen an app use the glass aesthetic as a selling point
danielbilekq OP
tbh I kinda dig the glass aesthetic. I understand it's not for anyone, that's why you can theme it
There must be something fascinating about writing Markdown apps - either it scratches an itch, or AI is really good at creating them. There's a flood of them on r/macapps and similar places.
danielbilekq OP
didn't know about that, but when I looked around, most of them were paid and just didn't really scratch the itch. this really starte as a simple editor for writing blog posts
Probably a lot of both.

Writing is also a deeply personal exercise for many, and I can say from personal experience that the environment I write in, from the room/place I'm in to the color scheme of my editor, really matters sometimes.

I haven't found a need to build my own editor, but I can see how someone else would.

orangea
It's because it's effectively impossible to make a markdown authoring app that meets everyone's needs, and people tend to be picky about what they want in a writing environment. People have strong preferences about WYSIWYG, flavor of markdown (pandoc/quarto/GFM/etc), theming support, some want notes to be able to link to each other, etc. As an example, I require math notation support for basically everything I write which automatically rules out 90% of markdown editors for me.
pbowyer
All of this, but underlying it I've come to the conclusion that Markdown isn't a good format for a writing environment beyond just simple prose. There's too much left up to the flavour of it and it's got weaknesses.

I've been experimenting with using Markdown (in Typora) in place of Word, but it (and others I've looked at) have zero support for image positioning or sizing, or a way to have different (pre-defined) styles on different tables.

Which is a shame because I like keeping my documents in plain text, in version control and efficiently read by my LLMs. LyX (https://www.lyx.org/) for LaTeX is the closest to what I'm thinking of that I know of, but maybe something exists for Asciidoc or Typst.

bityard
In recent years, I've written two!

I wrote my own wiki to use as a personal knowledge base to replace Dokuwiki because I wanted a simpler Markdown-based solution written in Python. I started it during the pandemic times and all of the code in there to date was written by hand. All of it was pretty easy except the CSS/layout parts which I'm just not very good at. It took months of free time to get it where I wanted.

I also recently created a day-to-day notes and daily planner app that's basically a bunch of markdown notes. I spent about a week of free time defining the problem, setting constraints, and refining with an LLM that wrote almost all of the code for me. I've been using it for months and it's working great.

The wiki uses Markdown because I browse it just as often as I edit and I appreciate some modicum of basic formatting. The daily notes app doesn't really _have_ to use markdown, I've just gotten accustomed to writing Markdown pretty much everywhere.

(These are on github, but I'm not posting the links here because I don't want to or care about promoting them.)

Abashedly raises hand as someone who's also written his own. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
yeah, it's easier to made them now then before.

I've made myself two editors recently:

https://wander.md - WYSIWYG editor that works on mac, iphone and iPad and has semantic versioning backend in.

https://original.me - fully native macOS editor that uses Apple Notes as backend.

those are ver interesting to build, but also way more possible. I think it would have take me years before.

When there is a cost. Please show it on the website. I couldn’t find if for wander.
wander is free.

i will add optional wander-native cloud sync and would probably charge for that.

jiehong
I thought it would compare to iA Writer, but misread
I suspect it's because there's a flood of people writing / looking at MD docs that never did before and want better tooling than is readily known to exist.

I think we're going to see a lot of dev-related tooling that traditional developers would scratch their head and think... who could this possibly be for, and why would anyone spend time making this...

And it's just because there's an entirely new class of people doing this kind of thing now.

somat
I always have a hard time understanding why anyone would want a dedicated markdown editor in the first place.

Obviously I am not the intended audience for them, but for me markdown is a fundamentally plain text format, Make nice looking plain text, and if you keep to certain well known patterns, you get a chance to run it through a typeset engine. Most of the point being the plain text. If the point were the typeset document, I would pick a better language.

As such, the ideal markdown editor is a text editor.

a nice md editor feels good. when all the UI is out of the way it gives a minimalism feel and i start to notice tiny details like 'this font is really soothing' and thats where i imagine i want to put my markdown thoughts in. a pure interface

explorations in minimalism

how is it different from obsidian?
danielbilekq OP
it does much less, not really an alternative to Obsidian
Obsidian's closed-source is it not?
How does this compare to Typora? That's the leader in this market as far as I can tell.
danielbilekq OP
much worse than Typora. this is a very basic markdown editor for writing blog posts in "minimalist" space. and it's just free
Paying Typora user here, and wondering the same.
Aside: The Typora website is horrible on mobile.
small bit of feedback, "Rice it until it feels like yours." is pretty jargon heavy for a landing page, i don't think all that many people outside linux/tech use that term, why not "customize"?
danielbilekq OP
think that's valid. gonna change that. thanks!
i don't think all that many people outside linux/tech use that term,

The term is quite a bit older than today's tech bubble.

It came out of hotrod car modification clubs that specialize in Japanese brands. Some consider it pejorative. (See: "rice rocket.")

It's funny that you say not many people outside of Linux/tech use that term when "ricing" started in car mod culture. It was used to describe the act of customizing your (typically Japanese import, hence the term "rice") car with an abundance of cosmetic mods, without investing in performance mods. So your car would look really sleek and custom on the surface, but it would still drive like a stock '94 Honda CR-X del Sol.

Before anyone asks: "race inspired cosmetic enhancement" is a backronym, not the origin of the phrase.

gritzko
For Macs, there is iA Writer already. Why don't you make something equally polished for other platforms? I am genuinely interested, I always wanted iA Writer for Linux. Everything I tried falls short.
iA writer: neither free nor open source